<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Print is dead &#8211; long live the newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielpatricio.com/2009/04/06/print-is-dead-long-live-the-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielpatricio.com/2009/04/06/print-is-dead-long-live-the-newspapers/</link>
	<description>Rethinking how we communicate, collaborate and innovate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:32:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: danielpatricio</title>
		<link>http://danielpatricio.com/2009/04/06/print-is-dead-long-live-the-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>danielpatricio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielpatricio.com/?p=101#comment-211</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how true that is. 
 
The reason Brittanica, Encarta and premium papers are struggling is because people don&#039;t link to or frequent paid content which kills their google rank. 
 
It is a tough question and it is anyone&#039;s guess where they will go. 
 
However paying for flat content that is just rehashed newspaper articles, is not a sustainable advantage. They really need to look how to provide value on a competitive basis leveraging the advantages of each medium. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know how true that is. </p>
<p>The reason Brittanica, Encarta and premium papers are struggling is because people don&#039;t link to or frequent paid content which kills their google rank. </p>
<p>It is a tough question and it is anyone&#039;s guess where they will go. </p>
<p>However paying for flat content that is just rehashed newspaper articles, is not a sustainable advantage. They really need to look how to provide value on a competitive basis leveraging the advantages of each medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared O&#039;Toole</title>
		<link>http://danielpatricio.com/2009/04/06/print-is-dead-long-live-the-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared O&#039;Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielpatricio.com/?p=101#comment-209</guid>
		<description>True but i dont think it would kill their SEO if they set it up with like an intro paragraph then the read more button. Which means you have to subscirbe to read more. If that 1st paragraph is done well I think they can still have solid SEO.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True but i dont think it would kill their SEO if they set it up with like an intro paragraph then the read more button. Which means you have to subscirbe to read more. If that 1st paragraph is done well I think they can still have solid SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielpatricio</title>
		<link>http://danielpatricio.com/2009/04/06/print-is-dead-long-live-the-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>danielpatricio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielpatricio.com/?p=101#comment-190</guid>
		<description>I think they can make a case for ad supported content provided they compete with other online content. 
 
The problem is that the closed off content kills their SEO.  
 
Either way they have to make a decision on what route to monetization they will take. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they can make a case for ad supported content provided they compete with other online content. </p>
<p>The problem is that the closed off content kills their SEO.  </p>
<p>Either way they have to make a decision on what route to monetization they will take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared O&#039;Toole</title>
		<link>http://danielpatricio.com/2009/04/06/print-is-dead-long-live-the-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared O&#039;Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielpatricio.com/?p=101#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Agreed. If people want jounralists overseas getting the stories then they will have to be paying for something from the papers. This whole everything is free thing just went a litle to far. Newpapers ust jumped on board without thinking about the long-term. I think we will see a pullback where they require payment for certain things. And that is fine it has to be done. There will be people complaining at first as usual but if they want the expert info as you said it will be done.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. If people want jounralists overseas getting the stories then they will have to be paying for something from the papers. This whole everything is free thing just went a litle to far. Newpapers ust jumped on board without thinking about the long-term. I think we will see a pullback where they require payment for certain things. And that is fine it has to be done. There will be people complaining at first as usual but if they want the expert info as you said it will be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanprice</title>
		<link>http://danielpatricio.com/2009/04/06/print-is-dead-long-live-the-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanprice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielpatricio.com/?p=101#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Newspapers have not seen a drop in readership. Most papers across North America have actually seen an increase in readership. The reason papers are dying is because they have seen a steep drop in advertising. 
 
The current recession has scared advertisers from spending money, yet it has bolstered readership because people simply trust the news organizations that have been around for decades. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspapers have not seen a drop in readership. Most papers across North America have actually seen an increase in readership. The reason papers are dying is because they have seen a steep drop in advertising. </p>
<p>The current recession has scared advertisers from spending money, yet it has bolstered readership because people simply trust the news organizations that have been around for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdoss</title>
		<link>http://danielpatricio.com/2009/04/06/print-is-dead-long-live-the-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>sdoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielpatricio.com/?p=101#comment-119</guid>
		<description>So beautifullly written, I loved reading this article. Very eloquently put and thought provoking from sentence to sentence. You have given me a lot to think about  
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So beautifullly written, I loved reading this article. Very eloquently put and thought provoking from sentence to sentence. You have given me a lot to think about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
